A bizarre old Chestnut

After recommendations from various friends, Mrs smog and I decided to try out Le Marron last night. We had been told that it had good French food in a quaint environment, and the menus on the website looked promising; we were also tempted by the $40 corkage charge.When I called for a reservation they said they could only fit us in at 9, which worked fine for us, but when we arrived there did seem to be quite a few empty tables. The environment is indeed a bit “different” as you can see a little from the website: it is cosy and quaint, but the tables are quite close together and separated only by very light lacy curtains so it is not a place to have private conversations. The air-con is also HK-style, so Mrs smog had dinner in her outdoor coat.

The table was set with a pate and butter and a carafe of tap water when we arrived, the latter always being a plus point for me. We were offered the December menu and then a bowl of warm bread arrived – there was a selection of rolls, sticks and sliced baguette, all of which I enjoyed (Mrs smog doesn’t eat much bread).

Taking advantage of the low corkage I asked for a bottle of red that I had brought to be opened, which was done without fuss, but it was clear that “bring your own” also means “serve your own” (no big deal).

For starters, Mrs smog selected the Alaskan King crab legs, and I took the Bellota Grade Ibérico Ham. Both of these were excellent – I had forgotten how good properly aged ham can be.

We followed that with soup: pumpkin for me and lobster bisque for Mrs smog. The pumpkin was simple and warming, but nothing special. The lobster bisque was, unfortunately, not to Mrs smog’s taste at all. It had a very intense flavour (which Mrs smog described as “burnt”, but I wasn’t so sure) and wasn’t as creamy as “bisque” is usually taken to be.

The requested refill on the bread took an age to arrive, and consisted only of sliced baguette when it did.

For main courses, Mrs smog ordered the surf and turf (done medium-well); I hoped for the venison, but it was sold out, so I went for the lamb Wellington. The surf and turf was good – a very tasty bit of beef (actually done more medium than medium-well) and fresh king prawn with a few vegetables, mashed potato, and a little gravy. The lamb Wellington (cooked in an individual pastry case not sliced from a larger joint) was fine, although the lamb was a little over-cooked for my taste.

And this is where the bizarre bit came in. I had brought a second bottle of wine which I asked them to open and it was, unfortunately, badly corked. So Mrs smog caught the eye of a waitress and asked for the wine list. To which the unexpected response was that they don’t sell wine because they don’t have a licence. Slightly dumbfounded I asked to speak to the manager and pointed out to him that I had looked at their wine list on the website. Without a word he went and got one, noting though that many of the items (including the five cheapest reds and the house red) were out of stock.

While I was looking at it, Mrs  smog said to him that she had asked the waitress for a wine list and she had said they don’t have one. He replied “we cannot sell it to you but (pointing to me) we can sell to him”. Frankly, he was lucky that both of us were in a mellow mood, otherwise this could have got a bit messy, but as far as I can tell, Le Marron has a policy of only selling wine to gweilos.

The (apparently local) couple at the next table had a discussion about this (in Cantonese with smatterings of English), and and as far as I can tell, as marketed in Chinese, Le Marron does not have a wine list – they were quite surprised that I was able to get one from the manager. When I look at the Liquor Licensing Board’s website I see that Le Marron does have a “Club Liquor Licence”, no. 5312800371, but in order to get one of those it does need to be constituted and run as a “club”, with membership procedures, membership cards and so on, which it clearly isn’t. Why it thinks it can break the rules for a gweilo, but not for a Filipina is beyond me, but it leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.

Anyway, having got a bottle of the Australian Shiraz I decided to try the chese platter offered on the dessert menu. Unfortunately the waitress was only able to describe its contents in very generic terms, but what turned up were four small table water biscuits, each with a small portion of cheese: goat’s cheese (generic log), brie, a blue, and Boursin; there were a few grapes and a decoration of celery leaf. For a French restaurant this was a bit of a disappointment, but then again it was only $40.

So that was it. Overall I would say that most of the food is competently done, although the soups and the cheese were disappointing (but quite cheap); the quality of the ingredients in the starters and mains was good. However, the service is slow at times, and not easy to get when you are tucked away behind curtains – a couple of times we had to get up to attract the waitress’s attention. And the whole wine situation is bizarre. Having an apparently race-based policy on who they will sell to is really not good, and that is the main reason that Mrs smog and I are unlikely to be going there again soon. If you decide to try it then I suggest taking your own wine (and hope that it isn’t corked).

13 Responses to “A bizarre old Chestnut”

  1. Spike Says:

    Was thinking about trying this place as I was reading your review till I got to that nonsense about the wine list. There are plenty of other French restaurants in HK. Thanks for the warning.

  2. Beer guy Says:

    Please stop calling this a french restaurant it’s mostly a bad copy of it !

  3. smog Says:

    So what are your criteria for being able to call something a “French” restaurant? Only in France? Or run / managed / cooked by French people?

  4. Beer guy Says:

    Knowing at least how to make a correct French meal!

    Ok some other point :

    Surf and turf in a French restaurant ???
    A french restaurant without wine list ???
    Serving boursin on a cheese platter ? i mean why not “la vache qui rit” as well !

  5. Krad Says:

    Unfortunately not the only restaurant that has discriminatory menus and pricing based on race. From what I’ve seen they manage to exploit that club loophole fairly well too. Try to call them out on their wine lists and they can justify that as a private club, they reserve the right to discriminate. I have to say though that it would be tempting to try and bring something like that in front of a judge and get things sorted out for good.

  6. smog Says:

    So this isn’t a French restaurant then?
    http://news.bistrodhubert.com/bistrodhubert2007/uk/carte.asp

  7. Beer guy Says:

    Surf and turf is not a French meal !

    Le marron is a joke but local seems to enjoy their “French cuisine” a bit like they enjoy their French food from delifrance, or their italian cuisine in fat angelo

  8. hkorbust Says:

    Mr and Mrs Hkorbust had no such issues with the wine… weird – sorry to see that Mr and Mrs Smog did!

    Beer guy – I also had serious reservations about this place, thinking it would be pseudo French. After all “mes parents” live in France where I’ve spent a lot of time. But the food was good, surprising heavily on the upside – even for my parents.

    I think it seriously obnoxious to suggest that locals can’t cook French food. They may have lived there for decades for we know. And picked up French nationality.

    It’s also interesting to consider the Michelin guide giving 3 stars to a Chinese restaurant in HK recently: Would it fair to say that Michelin are probably not qualified to judge Chinese food?

    Cheers!

  9. Juno Watt Says:

    The Smogs having a bottle of wine each at dinner? Good on yer!

  10. smog Says:

    Indeed. Is that not quite common? In beer terms, only 3 pints each.

  11. Juno Watt Says:

    And then on to the secret karaoke bar for a witching hour’s yodelling?

  12. smog Says:

    Not that time as I recall: with the hours that Mrs smog works she only has enough energy left for very occasional warbling (and frankly she prefers to do it without me given that I generally fail to hide my feelings about her singing ability).

  13. Karen T Says:

    Abominable, but sadly not surprising. The Jim Crow-like segregational policy… a legacy of colonialism.

Leave a Reply